← Search

Joe Shaver

Little Rock, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 43W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Joe Shaver to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Phil Rampey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roger Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bradley McColey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Luneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-22 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Luneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · Landis/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cendey Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Shaver/Oyos/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Luneau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Landis/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Cisne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Landis/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cendey Roberts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Nelsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-28 · Szeto/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laza Razafimanjato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Landis/Shaver/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
57.4%
27W–20L · 51.5% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.6% of games
7.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.5% of games
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe