← Search

Hakeem Yatim

Conway, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 11W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Hakeem Yatim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jared Compton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Compton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-17 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helmi Yatim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parker Padgett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
William Hancock
2026-08-08 · Hakeem Yatim/Conway · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-1
L
2026-08-04 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helmi Yatim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Nelsen/Glenn/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tess Bradford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helmi Yatim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Parker Padgett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · Padgett/Maumelle/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Drew Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-08 · Nelsen/Glenn/NLR/BP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Garretson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-03 · Hakeem Yatim/Conway · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 20% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#2 Singles
14%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova