← Search

Andrew Olson

Trenton, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 34W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-15 · Expendables 8 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Expendables 8 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donald Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Kevin Collins / Srinivas Mandayam
2026-06-20 · Mercer County Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-30 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Onkar Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-25 · Mercer County Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Chua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Lieber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · Frosty Hollow Hurricanes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · Mercer County Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-17 · Expendables 7 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Duffield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-03 · Expendables 7 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Hillis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-06 · Expendables 7 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Duffield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
47.9%
23W–25L · 49.2% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 46.4% of games
8.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova