← Search

Christopher Plaskon

New Hope, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 42W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christopher Plaskon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
Jason Werts / David Miller
2026-06-13 · Reload and Fire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-03 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Reload and Fire · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Farnsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · Reload and Fire · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
David Miller / Andrew Olson
2026-04-25 · Reload and Fire · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · NJD/We Are Still A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · We Are A Problem · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Garingalao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-03-15 · We Are A Problem · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arjun Sapra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
W
2026-02-05 · We Are A Problem · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · We Are A Problem · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-3
W
2025-12-04 · We Are A Problem · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Garingalao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-23 · We Are A Problem · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Garingalao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
73.9%
34W–12L · 63.2% of games
4.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Singles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal