← Search

Sarah Hankamer

— year-end
70 matches · 52W–18L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Sarah Hankamer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-08-23 · HOCO-Hornsby · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
L
2026-07-05 · Sugar Creek (Jennifer Hornsby)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with LaShonna Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Douglass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
Deborah Citron / Donna Marceau
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Keys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with DeAsiah Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Etzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Garol Orr / Courtney Johnson
2026-03-17 · USTA Atlanta/Tricinda Waites · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miesje Zimmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-24 · USTA Atlanta/Tricinda Waites · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cotonya Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-10 · USTA Atlanta/Tricinda Waites · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Etzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-15 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Keys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-12-13 · Sugar Creek (Tricinda Waites)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Etzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
80%
44W–11L · 60.2% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer