← Search

Jamie Debusk-Loop

Garland, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 15W–23L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jamie Debusk-Loop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariana Fauteux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Heather Graham / Jenna Dinh
2026-08-22 · Team 11 Jennifer Richter 7.5W · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · Team 11 Jennifer Richter 7.5W · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Aiken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Steele Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kimberly Grogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ha Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Lee / Jen Mulhern
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Hashimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Hashimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Hashimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-22 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ha Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ha Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-13 · Huffhines/James-Huffman W4.0F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Hashimoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52%
13W–12L · 53.2% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 40.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal