← Search

Victor Kong

Mount Joy, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 96W–130L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Victor Kong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Stover / Stauffer · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trisha Pearson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Stover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Donell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Slack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Hempfield Pierce Diadem 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Hempfield Pierce Diadem 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zach Manifold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Spidle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Saltzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
52.2%
36W–33L · 50.4% of games
7.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.3%
44W–51L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
9.1%
2W–20L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
100 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
50 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe