← Search

Zach Manifold

Elizabethtown, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 122W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Zach Manifold to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
W
2026-08-22 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-04 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Saul Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Slack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Simmons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-19 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Steed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Setlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victor Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-16 · Hempfield String Theory 18+ - Roeder · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
15W–5L · 60% of games
3.5
53%
61W–54L · 52.7% of games
4.0
7.4%
2W–25L · 35.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
51.1%
23W–22L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.1% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert