← Search

Chad Arnett

Huber Heights, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 90W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chad Arnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-08-22 · STC-Sayer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · STC-Sayer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · STC-Sayer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · STC-Sayer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricardo Blanco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · STC-Sayer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · STC-Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Pignatiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · STC-Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Pignatiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-21 · STC-Sayer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Coates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · STC-Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Araujo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-01 · STC-Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · STC-Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isaac Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-11 · STC Sayer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
79.6%
78W–20L · 61% of games
4.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.2% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 42.9% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova