← Search

Philip Vandeursen

— year-end
89 matches · 64W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Philip Vandeursen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-05-02 · KTC-Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dane Ranney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · KTC-Walters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dane Ranney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Edward McCall / Tae Kim
2026-04-17 · KTC-Walters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · KTC-Walters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Wolters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · KTC-Walters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miles Aquino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-18 · KTC-Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andre Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Richard Miller / Chad Arnett
2026-01-11 · KTC Walters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dane Ranney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-08 · KTC Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Beiersdorfer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · KTC Walters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Wolters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-10-25 · KTC Walters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-11 · KTC Walters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Clouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · KTC Walters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
85%
51W–9L · 62.3% of games
4.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.6% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 53% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams