← Search

Jennifer Moore

Philadelphia, PA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
50 matches · 26W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-07-05 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Honora Hegarty / Jada Young
2026-06-06 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Rogozinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Forge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Rogozinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Penn Franklins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aleli Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Rogozinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · Penn Franklins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Serwo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Pain in the Grass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Forge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamela Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sami Souders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-20 · Bad News Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamela Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-13 · Bad News Ballerz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Phumvadee Wangtrakuldee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
100%
9W–0L · 61.6% of games
4.5
27.3%
6W–16L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.1% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert