← Search

Glenn Snowden

Buffalo, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 42W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Glenn Snowden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Wilbon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · Buffalo One 8 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Glennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Buffalo One 8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darren Stohr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Buffalo One · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Saumil Deora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-14 · Buffalo One 8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Darren Stohr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cecile Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-07 · Buffalo One 8 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Glennon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Net Wizards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mostafa Nouh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Buffalo One · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sergio Quevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Net Wizards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravi Ranade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Net Wizards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with BISWAJIT ROY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 39.6% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova