← Search

Karen Taubenslag

— year-end
143 matches · 105W–38L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Karen Taubenslag to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2025-12-14 · Team 2 Taubenslag - Mixologists · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laith Layous mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-11-30 · Team 2 Taubenslag - Mixologists · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laith Layous mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Aravind Krishna / Shannon Young
2025-11-21 · Team 2 Ogilvie - Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with RICARDO DURAN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · Team 2 Taubenslag - Mixologists · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laith Layous mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-3
W
Elizabeth McCann / Manu Balasubramanian
2025-11-06 · Team 2 Ogilvie - Triple Threat · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with RICARDO DURAN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-10-25 · Team 2 Taubenslag - Mixologists · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Laith Layous mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
Amelia Lawson / Ekaterina Potapova
2025-09-21 · Team 1 Acosta- Lady High Rollers · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jessica Doan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-03 · Team 1 Acosta- Lady High Rollers · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Assel Jumamukhambetova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-05-10 · Jakubik · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ekaterina Potapova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-04-19 · Jakubik · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tara Jakubik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4
W
2025-03-23 · Mixologists · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Mead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-03-15 · Mixologists · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Mead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.5
89.5%
34W–4L · 64.4% of games
5.0
25%
3W–9L · 45.2% of games
9.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.8% of games
9.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 54.4% of games
9.5mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer