← Search

Caitlin Young

Falls Church, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 30W–18L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Ye Hu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-05 · Team 2 Graces Aces Super High Tri · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ye Hu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Leah Noonan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Fedosenkova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alysia Rodgers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-3
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with David Todd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with David Todd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with David Todd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Noonan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · Team 4 String Theory · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zachary Errickson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-3
W
2026-03-22 · Team 8 Backhanded Compliments · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · Team 8 Backhanded Compliments · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Singer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 70.1% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
8.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.8% of games
9.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe