← Search

Diane Wood

Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
301 matches · 142W–159L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history301 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Wood/SH/mixed tri 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gabriel Prado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-19 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Wood/SH/mixed tri 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gabriel Prado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · Wood/SH/mixed tri 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Bird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Millie Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Robert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-17 · Wood/SH 18s 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gabriel Prado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Wood/SH/tri 4.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Millie Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-28 · Wood/SH 18s 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gabriel Prado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Wood/PH 18s 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ashley Robert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · Wood/SH 18s 8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gabriel Prado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.7% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 36.5% of games
4.0
60.4%
64W–42L · 53.6% of games
4.5
18.9%
10W–43L · 38.3% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games
8.0
59.5%
25W–17L · 53% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 29.2% of games
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
40.5%
15W–22L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
92 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert