← Search

Carmen Walker

Oak Park, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 109W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carmen Walker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-08-03 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amira Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shannon Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · FAC-Walker 55s 6.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amira Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marva Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Holloman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
Carolyn Lacusta / Megan Lacusta
2026-06-14 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amira Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · HAWK- Brooks 18s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amira Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · FAC-Lewis 40s 3.0 NW F4 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Heaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · FAC-Lewis 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #3 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · FAC-Lewis 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #2 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 53.2% of games
3.0
54.4%
74W–62L · 50.4% of games
3.5
19.6%
9W–37L · 38.4% of games
6.0
10%
1W–9L · 34.4% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 57.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
42 matches
#2 Singles
12%
31 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
#3 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer