← Search

Cheryl Hartel

Riley, MI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 61W–105L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Hartel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-08-03 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Free
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Hoch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Lukas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · PEACH-Hartel 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Sinutko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · PEACH-Hartel 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Sinutko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · PEACH-Hartel 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-20 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alison Martell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · PEACH-Hartel 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Kraase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Sinutko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Katie Hrisoulis / Donna Smith
2026-06-02 · PEACH-Hartel 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sara Sessions
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
44.6%
25W–31L · 48% of games
3.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 35.4% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.7% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.3% of games
6.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 35.3% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.4% of games
6.0mixed
29.6%
8W–19L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova