← Search

Cheryl Planck

— year-end
60 matches · 31W–29L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Cheryl Planck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2023-11-18 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Cook (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-10-21 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Cook (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-10-14 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Cook (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geralyn Koehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2023-09-30 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Cook (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Laurie Rothbard / Kimberly Robertson
2023-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Kaiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2, 1-0
W
Katrina Vander Meer / Lisa VanderMeer
2023-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Poindexter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Mappes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Kristen Calhoun / Leyna Mulholland
2023-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2023-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alana Voege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams11 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.2% of games
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.5% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe