← Search

Scott Kilgren

— year-end
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Kilgren to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Jamie Price / Chris Beatty
2026-04-18 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Motta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-21 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joshua Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-02-21 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Poptic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milan Jovanovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
John Turner / Nick Nieset
2026-01-24 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
James Martin / David Clark
2025-11-08 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-3
W
2025-09-27 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milan Jovanovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
Surendran Manoharan / James Martin
2025-05-02 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Geoffrey Bibo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-04-11 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Geoffrey Bibo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 71% of games
4.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 42.4% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.6% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
9 matches
#2 Singles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer