← Search

Diane Stief

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 39W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Stief to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Dejohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn DeCaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Takako Sachse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jasmine Trouten / Julie Joseph
2026-06-09 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Hassett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Hassett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Sharkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Rocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Hassett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Rocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Rocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.2% of games
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 51.7% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.2% of games
7.0
36.4%
12W–21L · 44.1% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova