Miriam Abe
131 matches · 71W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Miriam Abe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history131 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 40W4.0 6.ACN Sheridan Sat 4 $24
NITA E 40W40e Racket Club-Willis/Korreck
NITA E 80W55d Score-Hennessy/Matkovic
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 1Barr Willis Sat 3 $24
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 7.Barr Willis Sat 3 $27
NITA S 40W40f Huntley-Willis/Korreck
NITA S 80W55a Rush Copley-Adams
NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
61%
25W–16L · 55.3% of games
8.0
54.3%
25W–21L · 54.3% of games
8.5
50%
20W–20L · 50.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#1 Singles
18%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.