← Search

Amber Juraszek

Gulfport, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 63W–74L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amber Juraszek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelly Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-03 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frances Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · BBTC - Juraszek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · BBTC - Chowske/Stewart 3.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick McGuffee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · BBTC - Juraszek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johnny Hisaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · BBTC - Juraszek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johnny Hisaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · BBTC - Juraszek/Ward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-25 · BBTC - Chowske/Stewart 3.5 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick McGuffee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · BBTC - Juraszek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renaldo Jordan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · BBTC - Juraszek/Ward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Thomas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · BBTC - Juraszek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-18 · BBTC - Chowske/Stewart 3.5 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daryle Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 49.3% of games
4.0
19.2%
5W–21L · 32.9% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.8% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
95%
19W–1L · 61.6% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams