← Search

Tamra Godfrey

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 107W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tamra Godfrey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Yang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Christine Yang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · SWW-JTC-Ochoa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with J Michael Diaz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Josh Pinyerd championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
David Smith / Mayumi Barber
2026-07-05 · SWW-JTC-Ochoa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Lai championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Christine Yang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · SWW-JTC-Ochoa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · SWW-JTC-Ochoa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Chapin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · SWW-JTC-Ochoa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with J Michael Diaz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-07 · NWW-AYTC-Hood · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · NWW-AYTC-Hood · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Neiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 61.1% of games
5.0
40.5%
15W–22L · 45.4% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.7% of games
4.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
36.4%
12W–21L · 43.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.7% of games
9.0mixed
46.5%
20W–23L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
27 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
21 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe