← Search

Caitlin Thomas

Water Valley, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 70W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Thomas - NC - Oxford · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicki Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Flowers - NC - Oxford · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicki Lindsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Nicole Hill / Alison van Brocklin
2026-08-10 · Hopkins - NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mattie Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Glasgow/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Abby Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nicole Hill / Donna Fullilove
2026-08-04 · Hopkins - NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Duff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
Nicole Hill / Bradi Beard
2026-07-22 · Hopkins - NC- Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Duff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Heather McDonald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Summers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glenn Barker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Heather McDonald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-04 · Grafton-Oxford · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Grafton-Oxford · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Grafton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Marley/Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Grafton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.6% of games
4.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 60.1% of games
7.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 59.8% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
13%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer