← Search

Brad Clayton

New Albany, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 24W–6L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brad Clayton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-07-12 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley McLellan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Bumgardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · Jamie Lindsey 18+ mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morris Kelly Snyder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · 40+ Jamie Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-19 · 40+ Jamie Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Waldrop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-16 · Philips/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Cousar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Neal Patel / Alfredo Ale
2026-05-13 · Jamie Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · Philips/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-30 · Philips/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alfredo Ale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Neal Patel / Alfredo Ale
2026-04-25 · Jamie Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 65.2% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.8% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.1% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 62.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova