← Search

Elita Roberts

Prospect, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 48W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Elita Roberts to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
Christine Przeworski / Lisa Mercado
2026-07-06 · A40 4.0W Reeder · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Rockwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · A40 4.0W Reeder · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Hamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-23 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-21 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Scheetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · KY/LOU/GROVE/WILKINS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Reeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-10 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Heather Long / Lisa Gustafson
2025-05-31 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Sarah Johnson / Stephanie Townsend
2025-05-17 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
84.3%
43W–8L · 65.4% of games
4.5
15.8%
3W–16L · 36.3% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert