← Search

Linda Gibson

— year-end
31 matches · 9W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Linda Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-06-06 · Flames · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Veronica Antonelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-30 · Flames · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Seminsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-05 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · Flames · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Pina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-15 · Flames · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · Acing Gracefully · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-29 · Acing Gracefully · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-23 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Emily Price / Julie Gerron
2025-05-04 · Fair Oaks Ranch Flame · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Obrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
L
2025-04-26 · Fair Oaks Ranch Flame · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Obrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-01 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-22 · Fair Oaks Flame · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
31%
9W–20L · 41.9% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams