← Search

Gail Collamore

Schertz, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 11W–27L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Gail Collamore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Let’s Play · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Hanssen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-06 · Let’s Play · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Weatherford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · Let’s Play · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Heinrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Let’s Play · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Weatherford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Jill Fox / Linda Gibson
2026-03-05 · Rally Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Erhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-26 · Rally Girls · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Barad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-24 · TBM - HOA Tennis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-12 · Rally Girls · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-10 · TBM - HOA Tennis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Linville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-02 · TBM - HOA Tennis · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Barrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-15 · Rally Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-13 · TBM - HOA Tennis · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Colvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
20%
5W–20L · 39.2% of games
6.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova