← Search

Jennifer Childress

Austin, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 69W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Childress to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
2026-09-12 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mairin Cotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · That Was In! · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · UT 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Pyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christine Schrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · That Was In! · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-16 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adriana Urmeneta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · UT 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Damico Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · UT 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Esquivel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marissa Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-21 · UT 4.5 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Esquivel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 63.9% of games
4.5
55.3%
42W–34L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 57.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert