← Search

Rebecca Stephens

— year-end
147 matches · 94W–53L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Stephens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
L
Ruth Hjelmeland / Paige Welch
2026-09-12 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colette Bellville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · Grip It and Rip It · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine MacAn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-08 · Grip It and Rip It · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Durham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Grip It and Rip It · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alison Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Beauty & The Beast · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Burton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Beauty & The Beast · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Burton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amber Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-19 · Patriots · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Coutts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-16 · Patriots · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cherie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · Patriots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cherie Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · 4.5 Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amber Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · Patriots · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Coody Smits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-1
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
77.3%
68W–20L · 59.3% of games
4.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 52.2% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer