← Search

Rachel Bigby

— year-end
82 matches · 42W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Bigby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-07-31 · TCR: Brekovsky/Camp · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · ROC: Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · TCR: Brekovsky/Camp · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Alfano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · ROC: Team Saffran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Team Saffran · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
Bridget Larimer / Leah Gordon
2026-07-10 · TCR: Brekovsky/Camp · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Elizabeth Schuber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Team Saffran · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · ROC: Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alice Lewis-Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · Team Saffran · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-08-05 · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Brekovsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Taylor Futerman / Kathleen Spellane
2025-08-01 · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Alfano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-25 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Alfano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 57% of games
4.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#3 Female Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams