← Search

Alice Lewis-Hickey

Rochester, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 119W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alice Lewis-Hickey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-08-12 · ROC: Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Alfano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-05 · ROC: Team Saffran · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Verstraete
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · ROC: Team Saffran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Verstraete
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jill Belote / Elizabeth White
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Mosher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Ashlen Grote championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · ROC: Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with LISA AQUINO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-2
L
2026-07-15 · ROC: Team Saffran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · ROC: Team Saffran · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Bigby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · Western: Reilly/Hickey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlen Grote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · Western: Reilly/Hickey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah McKnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-09 · Western: Reilly/Hickey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Zablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · with Ashlen Grote championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
73.5%
50W–18L · 60.2% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.3% of games
8.0
81%
17W–4L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
59%
23W–16L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer