← Search

Donna Reiser

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 68W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Donna Reiser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-09-02 · ACP.Schoots · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susana Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · KF.Lee · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · MD.Metcalf · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sophea Duke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · MD.Metcalf · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Oury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-05 · MD.Metcalf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merri Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · KF.Lee · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Birchfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · KF.Reiser · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Reiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · KF.Reiser · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Reiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · MD.Metcalf · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ilona Peszlen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · MD.Metcalf · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · MD.Metcalf · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · KF.Reiser · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Reiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72%
36W–14L · 56.8% of games
4.0
27%
10W–27L · 39.1% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.9% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 28.1% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal