← Search

Marie Gelston

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
378 matches · 216W–162L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marie Gelston to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history378 matches
W
2026-09-10 · TOC.Jones · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vanese Clough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · TOC.Hollett · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · ACP.Lowrance · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Sielaty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Jennifer Smith / Patti Hulbert
2026-08-27 · TOC.Jones · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Byerly Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kazue Ridley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · TOC.Hollett · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · TOC.Jones · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vanese Clough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patty Parrnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Pa.Alford18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kazue Ridley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · We.Sielaty55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Wolborsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Je.Wolborsky40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ngoc Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.Hollett · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Liddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 66.9% of games
3.0
58.6%
112W–79L · 51.8% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.2% of games
5.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.8% of games
5.5
65.9%
27W–14L · 57.7% of games
6.5
50%
28W–28L · 49.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 27.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
140 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
130 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
77 matches
#2 Singles
3%
13 matches
#3 Singles
3%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert