← Search

Danielle Black

Hattiesburg, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 52W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Danielle Black to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Pinebelt 40’s 8.5 combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Holcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Pinebelt 40’s 8.5 combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · Hudson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ishee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-6
W
2026-07-19 · Bishop Kolbo 40+ 4.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ishee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
8-2
W
2026-07-12 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landon Black mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landon Black mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hector Custode mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · Do, Jennifer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-5
L
2026-05-07 · Black-HRC-40’s-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Tatum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Black-Tatum-4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri Galey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Black-HRC-40’s-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Tatum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 57.5% of games
7.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer