← Search

Elizabeth Schwartz

Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 22W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
W
2026-09-02 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Dyess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carly Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Misty White / Melissa Wright
2026-08-25 · 40+ 6.5 Schwartz Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Dyess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-23 · Tatum 40+ 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Danielle Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Caves 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Caves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
Annette Foreman / Melissa McDaniel
2026-05-11 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Hutchinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandi Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-20 · Schwartz-3.5-HRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonya Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-26 · Rodgers-3.5-18's-HRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · Schwartz/Racquet Club/PB · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Holcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 56.6% of games
6.5
100%
10W–0L · 65.2% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 39.5% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal