← Search

Jennifer Bradshaw

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 67W–44L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Bradshaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Bryant, Debbie · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Wheat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Bryant, Debbie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Wheat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-17 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Bryant, Debbie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Wheat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Bailey, Heather · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Rayborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Denise McCray / Michael Thomas
2026-07-25 · Biddle, Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bradshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Rayborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Biddle, Warren · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bradshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Covey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Biddle, Warren · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Bradshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
Amy Jones / Kathleen Biggs
2026-06-14 · Castle, Mandy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 63.6% of games
3.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 53.6% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.5% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.9% of games
3.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 69.5% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe