← Search

Jamie Howard

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 77W–51L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jamie Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Ford, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Lauren Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-02 · Ford, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kaytlin Benzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Howard, Jamie · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leigh Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-20 · Howard, Jamie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Devan Bucklew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · Ford, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Lauren Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Howard, Jamie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Devan Bucklew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Cooper, Stephany · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bagwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-05 · Bucklew, Devan · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with BREANA NORTON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Howard, Jamie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Bucklew, Devan · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Howard, Jamie · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yvette Major
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Howard, Jamie · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yvette Major
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
65.6%
21W–11L · 53.7% of games
3.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 57.6% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 42.6% of games
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.2% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.5% of games
2.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games
3.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.7% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova