← Search

Leigh Ann Barker

— year-end
96 matches · 42W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Leigh Ann Barker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Giaccone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-05 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sunanda Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Giaccone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Woodlake Poindexter/Estes 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Gallegos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Glen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Glen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Glen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · MTC Cousineau · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Hayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Fath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Fath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Glen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
55%
33W–27L · 51.4% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 40.5% of games
9.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova