← Search

Dina Weddle

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 148W–61L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dina Weddle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-09-05 · ACAC Bradt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-29 · ACAC Bradt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · ACAC 10sBradts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liesl Delisio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · ACAC Bradt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Bradt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · ACAC 10sBradts · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · ACAC Fabulous 40+ Ladies - Schuetzinger · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Zachry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · ACAC Morgan 18 WeekDAY · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-26 · ACAC Fabulous 40+ Ladies - Schuetzinger · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · 1 ACAC DELISIO · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
19W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.5
87.5%
42W–6L · 66.9% of games
4.0
52%
26W–24L · 53.6% of games
6.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 62.9% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.4% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#1 Singles
25%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
34 matches
#2 Singles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams