← Search

Karen Huffman

— year-end
159 matches · 96W–63L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Karen Huffman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim Reiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · #4 Doubles · with Nanelle Rosales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · with Nanelle Rosales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Tracy Jay / Lauren Pennington
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Nanelle Rosales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nanelle Rosales championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cathy Maler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Konstans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-18 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cami Gorsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Shukis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · Gleneagles/Shukis-Wright W4.0T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nina Konstans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · SARASOTA/Silberbusch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tambra Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · SARASOTA/Silberbusch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Svetlana Janglin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams64 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
65.6%
42W–22L · 57.4% of games
4.5
8.3%
1W–11L · 33.2% of games
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.2% of games
8.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 61.3% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.9% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova