← Search

Candace Jemiolo

Stamford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 41W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Candace Jemiolo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-05-30 · KH:4.0:O'Hagan/Harris · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · KH:4.0:O'Hagan/Harris · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-04-25 · KH:4.0:O'Hagan/Harris · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · CP: 4.5 18 :Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alessandra Veronesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-27 · CP: 4.5 18 :Thomas · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-02 · CP: 4.5 18 :Thomas · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-12-01 · CP: 4.5 18 :Thomas · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-19 · KH:Racketeers:Scrivines · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-17 · CP: 4.5 18 :Thomas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Galante
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-31 · Armonk Indoor 55 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Naomi Proctor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-15 · Armonk Indoor 55 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katharina Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-10 · Armonk Indoor 55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Naomi Proctor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.6% of games
4.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.3% of games
4.5
30.4%
28W–64L · 43.1% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#1 Singles
15%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams