← Search

Bob Lounsbury

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 67W–114L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Bob Lounsbury to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · Love Means Nothing · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-01 · Net Worth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jake Riehemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Net Worth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Sauder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Net Worth · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuri Mereszczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Net Worth · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Cahoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · Net Worth · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Net Worth · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yuri Mereszczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Net Worth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damian Lettieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Net Worth · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · Buffoons · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Dark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · Buffoons · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Gabby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
43%
46W–61L · 46.9% of games
4.5
11.5%
3W–23L · 36.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.6% of games
8.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#1 Singles
14%
25 matches
#2 Singles
11%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert