← Search

Sarah Vergon

— year-end
151 matches · 100W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Vergon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Slattery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
Natalie Chang
2026-05-14 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-13 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Vecchio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-24 · A40 4.0W 2 WCC Vitou · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Moritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 2 WCC Vitou · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-14 · NEO/Hardy/A18/3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-10 · A40 4.0W 2 WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75.9%
66W–21L · 61.9% of games
4.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.7% of games
6.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 58% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 37.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
12%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova