← Search

Teresa Hardy

— year-end
112 matches · 64W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Teresa Hardy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Vergon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cristine Torek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W WCC Moritz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Chiricosta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burlingame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · A40 3.5W WCC Moritz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W PW1 Hardy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burlingame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-07-14 · NEO/Hardy/A18/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burlingame
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-07-10 · A40 4.0W 2 WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Vergon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-07 · NEO/Hardy/A18/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.4% of games
3.5
64.4%
38W–21L · 58.1% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 42.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.5% of games
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 42.5% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King