← Search

Lisa Zieske

Audubon, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 84W–153L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Zieske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Frog 65+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Frog 55+ Zieske · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Borowy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-04 · Frog 65+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryjo Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Frog 65+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Borowy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Judy Christis / Judy Horrocks
2026-07-07 · Frog 65+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Borowy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · Frog 55+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryjo Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-21 · Frog 55+ Zieske · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · Simply Smashed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Cobrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-05 · Simply Smashed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Wildman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · Frog 18+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryjo Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-21 · Frog 18+ Zieske · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryjo Coyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Theresa Smith / Heather Zielinski
2026-05-15 · Simply Smashed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Gieske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
3.5
30.4%
34W–78L · 42% of games
4.0
18.4%
7W–31L · 36.5% of games
7.0
51.8%
29W–27L · 51% of games
8.0
30%
3W–7L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
72 matches
#1 Singles
16%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
27 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova