← Search

Shery Cassidy

Windermere, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 71W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shery Cassidy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with FABRICIA FUNES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Tormey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Kinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with FABRICIA FUNES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Tormey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Denise Tormey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Tormey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Barritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-17 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · Orange/Bottinelli · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
44%
22W–28L · 45.6% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.4% of games
8.5
60%
6W–4L · 58.9% of games
9.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games
9.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer