← Search

Michael O'Neill

— year-end
82 matches · 66W–16L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Michael O'Neill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Malpiedi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · STLWC/Javaheri-Ryan/18&Over7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle DuClos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Breanna Stenzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · STLWC/Javaheri-Ryan/18&Over7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sandweiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-21 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sandweiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenzie Rawden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-12-07 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sandweiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-16 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thanaphat Chananukul
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-10-05 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Gibbons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-14 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pj Panesar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
80.3%
49W–12L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova