← Search

Steven Gibbons

— year-end
65 matches · 37W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Steven Gibbons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Suddarth · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raymond Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Suddarth · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raymond Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · The Arch Rivals (Suddarth) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ritika Sibal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · The Arch Rivals (Suddarth) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ritika Sibal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-02 · The Arch Rivals (Suddarth) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheena Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas de Haan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas de Haan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5, 1-0
L
Sam Edwards / Michael Ho
2026-03-01 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas de Haan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-22 · STLWC/Sandweiss/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas de Haan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-12-14 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-11-16 · Sandweiss/Chess Club (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Sandweiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 45.1% of games
3.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.3% of games
4.0
47.1%
16W–18L · 47.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Singles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe