← Search

Alex Schaefer

O Fallon, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 73W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alex Schaefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Reznack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ian Keillor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-15 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-16 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Etling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Hodge/Kamman (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-11 · Hodge/Kammann (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Reznack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-04 · Hodge/Kammann (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-14 · Hodge/Kammann (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Hipkiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Hodge/Kammann (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Hodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
83.3%
60W–12L · 64.7% of games
4.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer